
A trivial exchange between two Pakistan cricket administrative leaders about women’s cricket during August 2024 suddenly shifted course. Both administrators agreed during their analysis that Australia, England and India control the women’s sport through international events and profitable T20 league operations. The competition between these nations results in unlucky players from lower status teams being left out as opportunities disappear from view.
Why Some Players Get More Opportunities
From a distance, the scheduling of international women’s cricket might seem fair. Every Full Member nation gets its fair share of fixtures. However, frustration among players and administrators stems from something far more significant—exposure in franchise leagues.
Despite the argument that participation is merit-based, the numbers tell a different story. Players from England, Australia, and India receive far more invitations to high-paying leagues, while those from teams like Pakistan and Bangladesh are often overlooked. Even 1xbet apk, known for offering diverse gaming opportunities, provides a more level playing field than these exclusive cricketing circuits.
Some exceptions exist. The Caribbean cricketers Deandra Dottin Stafanie Taylor and Hayley Matthews have secured positions at multiple cricket leagues. Feminine cricket stars Marizanne Kapp of South Africa and Shabnim Ismail of South Africa as well as Sophie Devine and Amelia Kerr of New Zealand and Chamari Athapaththu of Sri Lanka have all succeeded in gaining entry to these top-level tournaments.
Participation in the Top Three Women’s Leagues:
Country | WBBL | WPL | The Hundred |
Australia | 176 | 17 | 31 |
England | 33 | 7 | 108 |
India | 13 | 73 | 6 |
New Zealand | 17 | 3 | 7 |
West Indies | 4 | 3 | 3 |
South Africa | 10 | 4 | 8 |
Pakistan | 1 | 0 | 0 |
How Domestic Leagues Shape Global Cricket
Franchise cricket is designed to elevate local talent by letting them compete alongside international stars. Australia, the pioneer in women’s T20 leagues, has reaped immense benefits. Their domestic setup is so strong that even players who don’t make the national squad regularly get picked by foreign leagues. England and India have tried to replicate this success, but many other nations still lag behind.
Beyond just money, these leagues provide access to better training, superior facilities, and stronger competition. They also allow for greater networking—learning from global superstars and adapting to different playing conditions. The financial stability these leagues offer has even led some cricketers, including Dottin, to step away from international duties and focus solely on league cricket.
The Growing Gap: Will It Ever Close?
This imbalance is unlikely to be resolved soon. While Australia and England continue to refine their domestic systems, many other boards remain hesitant to invest in women’s leagues. Pakistan, for instance, announced plans for a women’s league in 2021 under former PCB chairman Ramiz Raja.
Three years later, nothing has materialized. Bangladesh had tentative plans for a 2025 launch, only to abandon them at the last moment.
Without franchise leagues, these countries remain stuck in a cycle where their players get fewer opportunities to improve, fall behind in rankings, and become even less attractive to franchises. At present, Australia dominates the ICC rankings, followed by England and India. Teams like Pakistan and Bangladesh struggle at the bottom, unable to keep up.
The Unexpected Impact of Struggling Teams
Interestingly, even the worst-performing WPL teams have played a crucial role in developing young talent. Despite finishing last in both seasons, Gujarat Giants has given the most exposure to uncapped Indian players. This has allowed them to gain experience in high-pressure situations and fast-tracked their development.
Team | Balls Faced (Uncapped Players) | Balls Bowled (Uncapped Players) | Matches Won |
Delhi Capitals | 3 | 72 | 12 |
Mumbai Indians | 86 | 211 | 11 |
UP Warriorz | 314 | 144 | 7 |
RCB | 152 | 345 | 6 |
Gujarat Giants | 103 | 481 | 4 |
What’s Next?
Jon Lewis, head coach of both England’s women’s team and UP Warriorz, believes that limited overseas spots create healthy competition. “It forces players to improve and fight for those few slots. Competition drives development.”
While that may be true, the real issue lies with the lack of opportunities in developing nations. Until more boards invest in their own leagues, players from these countries will continue to be sidelined, and the divide between the “haves” and “have-nots” will only grow.